Screenwriter David McKenna wrote the screenplay for American History X and sold the rights to New Line Cinema when he was 26. The inspiration for the story came from the punk-rock scene of McKenna's childhood, where he often witnessed violent behavior. "I saw a lot of bigotry growing up, and it made me think about writing something about the world of hate-mongers. The point I tried to make in the script is that a person is not born a racist. It is learned through environment and the people that surround you. The question that intrigued me is: why do people hate and how does one go about changing that? My premise was that hate starts in the family". In order to make the characters as realistic as possible, McKenna interviewed and observed the behavior of skinheads during the writing process. He said "I had seen documentaries that just didn't ring true to me, and I wanted to write an accurate portrayal of how good kids from good families can get so terribly lost".
Movie's ratings
Collections
Show More
News
- Edward Norton Is at His Best in 'American History X' Collider August 28, 2022
American History X
(1998)7
| Country | |
| Runtime | 1 hr 59 min |
| Budget | $20 000 000 |
| Premiere: World | $23 875 714 July 1, 1998 |
| USA | $6 719 864 |
| Other countries | $17 155 850 |
| Box Office – Budget | $3 875 714 |
| Premiere: USA | $6 719 864 November 20, 1998 |
| theaters | 513 |
| rollout | 428 days |
| Digital: World | July 1, 2008 |
| Parental Advisory | Frightening & Intense Scenes, Profanity, Violence & Gore, Sex & Nudity, ..., Alcohol, Drugs & Smoking |
| |
| Production Companies | |
About the film American History X
A neo-Nazi is released from prison a changed man and hopes to prevent his younger brother from following in his footsteps.Смотреть онлайн
Сast and Crew
Director
Camera
Writer
Composer
Director
Camera
Writer
Composer
Videos Stills Posters Filming Promo Screenshots Covers
FAQ
What is “American History X” about?
It’s a crime drama about how neo-Nazi ideology and violence destroy a family—and how a person tries to break the cycle of hate. The story centers on two brothers and the consequences of their choices.
Why is the film partly black-and-white and partly in color?
The black-and-white sequences act as a visual marker for the past and the period of radicalization, while the color scenes represent the “present” and an attempt at reevaluation. It helps separate timelines and emotional states.
Why is “American History X” seen as a film about racism, yet often misinterpreted?
The film depicts how extremist ideology recruits people by offering an illusion of strength and “simple answers,” only to lead to tragedy. But the character’s charisma and shocking set pieces can cause some viewers to mistake depiction for endorsement, overlooking the devastating consequences the story emphasizes.
What role does Danny play in the film’s structure?
Danny is the viewpoint and the ‘inheritor’ of the conflict: through his observations and school assignment, we see how the older brother’s ideas transfer to the younger. His arc makes it not only about personal remorse, but also about how hard it is to stop hate from spreading.
Who directed the film and what stands out about the direction?
The director is Tony Kaye. The direction stands out for stark contrasts, an occasionally music-video-like editing pulse, and a form that underlines memory, trauma, and radicalization.
Who wrote the screenplay, and what does it emphasize?
The screenplay was written by David McKenna. It focuses on how people get pulled into ideology, family dynamics, the consequences of violence, and how difficult change is when the environment and the past push back.
Why is Derek considered one of Edward Norton’s strongest roles?
Because the character undergoes a drastic internal transformation—from confident, aggressive ideology to doubt, shame, and an attempt to repair harm. Edward Norton plays it not as an instant epiphany, but as a painful process with setbacks and a cost.
Why is the mother’s storyline important?
It shows the domestic side of the tragedy: how one family member’s radicalization turns home into a place of tension, fear, and compromises. Through the mother, the film makes ‘political’ ideas feel like a personal disaster for loved ones. The role is played by Beverly D’Angelo.
Why is the film so brutal, and is there artistic purpose to it?
The brutality isn’t there for spectacle; it’s used to show the real cost of ideology and violence—trauma, irreversibility, and a chain reaction of consequences. The film shocks on purpose to strip violence of romance and emphasize how long its effects last.
What themes beyond racism does “American History X” address?
Beyond racism, it deals with class anger and frustration, toxic masculinity, a cult of strength, peer influence, prison experience, family trauma, and accountability for words and actions. It also shows how easily someone looking for scapegoats can be manipulated.
Why is the ending considered especially tragic?
The ending underlines that the consequences of hate don’t vanish immediately, even after personal change. Violence breeds violence, and trying to leave an ideology may come too late once the chain reaction is already in motion.
What purpose does the prison portion of the story serve?
Prison is portrayed as a place where myths collapse: ideological ‘branding’ confronts reality, and survival forces a reevaluation of alliances and beliefs. It’s key to why the character’s change doesn’t feel like a simple moral lesson.
What makes Seth memorable, and why is he important?
Seth illustrates how a radical movement maintains control: through group pressure, provocation, black-and-white thinking, and replacing personal problems with ideology. His presence shows extremism is not just beliefs but a social machine. The character is played by Ethan Suplee.
Why is the film still discussed and recommended today?
Because it speaks directly to the mechanics of radicalization and how hate gets transmitted through communities and families. It remains relevant as a warning and a catalyst for discussions about violence, propaganda, accountability, and the possibility of change.
Is the film suitable for teens and for family viewing?
Due to graphic violence, sexual violence, hate speech, and heavy themes, it’s generally recommended for mature audiences only. For teens, it may be appropriate only with guidance and discussion (e.g., educational context), if suitable.
Does Edward Furlong’s character matter beyond being ‘the younger brother’?
Yes. Danny’s arc isn’t a side note—it’s essential to the theme of inheriting hate: it shows how a teenager absorbs ideology through authority, fear, and the need to belong. That’s why Edward Furlong is central to the film’s emotional and thematic payoff.
Production
Related Titles There are no related titles yet, but you can add them:
Tony Kaye — Top Rated Movies
Critique: 40
A violent, sober cautionary tale, strictly middle-of-the-road when it comes to its much-ballyhooed politics and grimly obvious in its telling.
The movie can’t explain as much as it wants to about what makes (and unmakes) a skinhead, but it carries us a fair distance.
There may be much to like about his movie, but it’s all been done before to more challenging degrees of moral ambiguity. That’s a...
Director Tony Kaye may be reaching for opera, but screenwriter David McKenna has set his sights distinctly lower.
A work of impressive scale and craft and not a movie that’s easy to dismiss in the end.
When Hollywood attacks a volatile issue, it inevitably spoon-feeds you the main components of the issue several times over.
A shockingly powerful screed against racism that also manages to be so well performed and directed that it is entertaining as well. [30 Octobe...
The film is always interesting and sometimes compelling, and it contains more actual provocative thought than any American film on race since Do th...
This is the sort of incendiary role a lot of actors would kill for, yet the shock of Norton’s performance isn’t its showboat flamb...
American History X is a crash course on how to make a message movie that resonates with crackling power.
It’s a testament to Norton’s utter immersion in the role that he can even halfway connect the dots between this fundamentally swee...
A violent, sober cautionary tale, strictly middle-of-the-road when it comes to its much-ballyhooed politics and grimly obvious in its telling.
As a visit to a world and a way of life most of us will never experience, American History X is vivid, and it feels honest. At the very l...
Kaye wants to say something about what produces a skinhead today, and though he doesn’t succeed fully in this endeavor, he does take us...
Though well-intentioned, turns out to be a simplistic and unconvincing look at a serious problem.
Trenchant and visceral, American History X may not be perfect, but it’s a darn sight better than good.
Two things hold the interest: Norton’s astounding performance, and a feeling for the male reality of reactionary working class environme...
The picture is smothered by solemn right-mindedness, and hobbled by scripter David McKenna’s simplistic, knee-jerk liberal take on suburban w...
Excellent in flashes, unintentionally absurd and lead-footed at other moments, the movie stumbles under the weight of its own grandiose intentions.
Norton’s performance, which is every bit as varied as his Oscar-nominated work in Primal Fear, once more demonstrates that he’s one of...
While this movie is sometimes overbaked, it is the first major studio release in a while to engross wall-to-wall.
What makes this film so powerful is that its unanswered questions force the audience to examine hate and its consequences making American History&n...
It’s hard to know whom to blame for the film’s choppiness, its mixture of rage and sentimentality, the stridency of some of the acting.
For all its surface verisimilitude and for all its focus on a problem that couldn’t be more current, this film can’t manage to fee...
Add critique link
Quotes
You think you’re the only one doing time, Derek? You think you’re here all alone?
Sign up and you will see here
friends impressions of the movie.
Friends comments and ratings
Watched
A stunning film that exposes the dark side of racism and violence. Strong acting and a deep story that makes you think about prejudice and hatred. This is a film that leaves a deep mark.
Watched
A provocative, sobering film that reveals one of the most pressing problems of society. The formation of personality against its background. An example of how racial prejudice originates in the family (including) and what it can lead to.
Watched
A perfect illustration of the idea that any maximalist ideology is naive and stupid nonsense, growing out of hatred and incompatible with real life. Another obvious advantage is Edward Norton’s extremely convincing performance and his punchy charisma.
Watched
A very powerful film about the struggle with inner demons and social injustice. The film vividly shows the impact of extremism on individuals and families. Emotionally heavy, but profound. Very impressive acting, especially Edward Norton.
Watched
In my opinion, Edward Norton was badly screwed with the Oscar that year. It’s a shame, because this is a wonderful acting job.
Watched
A dramatic interpretation of how dividing everything into «black» and «white» is inherently wrong. Kay’s original version, albeit, remains a mystery, but the resulting result, if there is one thing that can be reproached with, is the final turning of the drama switch to the maximum. But this is nitpicking.
Add a short review
280 characters