Movie's ratings

    News

    Soundtrack

    Killers of the Flower Moon (Soundtrack from the Apple Original Film)

    Different stars

    • 1 Robbie Robertson(Intro) The Sacred Pipe 0:39
    • 2 Robbie RobertsonOsage Oil Boom 2:51
    • 3 Robbie RobertsonMy Land...My Land 2:11
    • 4 Robbie RobertsonHeartbeat Theme/ Ni-U-Kon-Ska 3:34
    • 5 Robbie RobertsonThey Don't Live Long 2:55
    • 6 Robbie RobertsonThe Wedding 2:05
    • 7 Robbie RobertsonTribal Council 1:13
    • 8 Robbie RobertsonReign of Terror 2:51
    • 9 Robbie RobertsonInsulin Train 2:50
    • 10 Robbie RobertsonTulsa Massacre Newsreel 2:24
    • 11 Robbie RobertsonShame on Us 2:42
    • 12 Robbie RobertsonToo Much Dynamite 2:56
    • 13 Robbie RobertsonNot if it's Illegal 2:47
    • 14 Robbie RobertsonSalvation Adagio 3:11
    • 15 Robbie RobertsonStill Standing 3:48
    • 16 Rayna Gellert, Kieran Kane, Philip Jamison & David MansfieldTupelo Blues 2:54
    • 17 Vince Giordano & NighthawksLivery Stable Blues 1:55
    • 18 Adam NielsenThe Gallop, Chasse, Pas de Bourree 0:37
    • 19 Vince Giordano & NighthawksMetropolis (A Blue Fantasie) 2:11
    • 20 Andy SteinMollie 0:21
    • 21 Osage Tribal SingersWahzhazhe (A Song for My People) 6:26

    83

    Country
    Spoken Language
    Runtime 3 hr 26 min
    Budget $200 000 000 96
    Premiere: World $158 772 599 October 8, 2023
    USA $68 035 488
    Other countries $90 737 111
    Box Office – Budget – $41 227 401
    Premiere: USA $68 035 488 September 27, 2023
    first day $9 401 256
    first weekend $23 253 655
    Digital: World December 5, 2023
    Parental Advisory
    • Frightening & Intense Scenes

      plenty

    • Violence & Gore

      plenty

    • Profanity

      average

    • Alcohol, Drugs & Smoking

      few

    • Sex & Nudity

      few

    Production Companies
    Also Known As

    Description

    When oil is discovered in 1920s Oklahoma under Osage Nation land, the Osage people are murdered one by one — until the FBI steps in to unravel the mystery.

    Сast and Crew

    Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI

    About the Book

    Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI is a non-fiction book written by David Grann. Published in 2017, the book delves into the chilling true story of the Osage Indian murders in the 1920s. This series of crimes, which took place in Osage County, Oklahoma, involved the systematic killing of wealthy Osage Nation members who had become rich from oil deposits found beneath their land.

    Author

    David Grann is an acclaimed journalist and author known for his investigative work and narrative non-fiction. His meticulous research and compelling storytelling have earned him a reputation as a leading figure in the genre.

    Book's Themes and Impact

      • Historical Context: The book provides a detailed account of the Osage murders and the subsequent investigation, which was one of the first major cases handled by the newly formed FBI.

      • Social Commentary: It explores themes of greed, racism, and the exploitation of Native Americans, shedding light on a dark chapter in American history.

      • Investigative Journalism: Grann's work is praised for its thorough research and ability to weave a gripping narrative from historical events.

    Adaptation and Fidelity to the Book

    The film adaptation of Killers of the Flower Moon aims to stay true to the book's narrative and themes. Directed by Martin Scorsese, the film seeks to capture the essence of Grann's work, focusing on the historical and emotional depth of the story. While adaptations often require changes for cinematic purposes, the film strives to maintain the integrity of the book's portrayal of the events and characters involved.

    The True Story Behind "Killers of the Flower Moon"

    Historical Background

    The film "Killers of the Flower Moon" is based on the true events surrounding the Osage Indian murders in the 1920s. This dark chapter in American history is often referred to as the "Osage Reign of Terror." During this period, members of the Osage Nation in Oklahoma became some of the wealthiest people in the world due to the discovery of oil beneath their land.

    The Osage Murders

    In the early 20th century, the Osage people were granted headrights to the oil-rich land, which meant they received significant royalties from oil companies. However, this wealth attracted unscrupulous individuals who sought to exploit and murder the Osage to gain control of their headrights.

      • Between 1921 and 1925, more than two dozen Osage were murdered or died under suspicious circumstances.

      • The murders were often carried out through poisoning, shootings, and other violent means.

      • The conspiracy involved local businessmen, law enforcement, and even some members of the Osage community.

    The FBI Investigation

    The Osage murders eventually caught the attention of the newly formed Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Under the leadership of J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI launched an investigation led by agent Tom White. The investigation uncovered a vast conspiracy orchestrated by a local cattleman named William Hale, who sought to gain control of the Osage wealth through murder and manipulation.

    Adaptation and Accuracy

    The film is based on the book "Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI" by David Grann. The book meticulously details the events and the investigation, providing a comprehensive account of the Osage murders.

    The film adaptation strives to remain faithful to the historical events and the book's narrative. It captures the complexity of the conspiracy and the impact on the Osage community. While some artistic liberties may be taken for dramatic effect, the core story remains true to the real-life events that unfolded during this tragic period in American history.

    FAQ

    What is “Killers of the Flower Moon” about?

    It’s a crime drama about a string of murders targeting the Osage people in 1920s Oklahoma after an oil boom—and how greed, racism, and corruption seep into family ties and local power.

    Is the film based on true events?

    Yes. It draws from real crimes against the Osage and the investigations that became a key milestone in the development of U.S. federal law enforcement. It is based on the nonfiction book by Дэвида Гранна.

    What themes does the film explore beyond the crime story?

    It tackles colonial violence, systemic racism, resource exploitation, the corruption of justice by power, and the destructive compromises that can exist inside marriage and family.

    Why does the story focus on family dynamics rather than only the investigation?

    Because the crimes aren’t presented as distant true-crime headlines; they’re shown as evil embedded in everyday life—where trust, love, marriage, and kinship can be weaponized for control and profit.

    Who directed it, and why is it notable in that director’s work?

    It’s directed by Мартин Скорсезе. It stands out in his filmography by turning his recurring focus on power, money, and crime toward an Indigenous community and a tragedy that unfolds under a veneer of legality and social acceptance.

    Why is the film so long, and is the runtime justified?

    The runtime allows the film to depict the crimes as a system—how trust and manipulation are built, pressure escalates, and violence becomes ‘normalized’ over time. If you expect a fast-paced thriller, it may feel slow.

    How close is the film to the book, and why might it differ?

    The core facts and context remain, but the film shifts emphasis: it’s not only about ‘who investigated,’ but about how the crimes operated inside a community and a family. Adaptations inevitably condense timelines and merge events for dramatic structure.

    Who wrote the screenplay?

    The screenplay was developed by multiple writers; one of the key screenwriters is Эрик Рот.

    Is there violence in the film, and how intense is it?

    Yes. The violence can be brutal and emotionally heavy, generally not for spectacle but to underline the cost of impunity and the fear people live under. Sensitive viewers should note themes of murder, threats, and trauma.

    Why does the film spend so much time on the Osage community and daily life?

    It prevents the Osage from being reduced to ‘true-crime victims’ and instead presents them as a living community with traditions, family, joy, and grief—making the scale of loss clearer when violence targets an entire people.

    Is the film more about the investigation or about moral choices?

    More about moral decay and complicity: the investigation matters, but the film’s strongest angle is how people rationalize evil when money, power, and ‘profitable’ loyalty are at stake.

    Why has the film sparked so much discussion and debate?

    Because it confronts a painful historical trauma, depicts violence as systemic, and asks uncomfortable questions about who benefits. It also prompts debate about perspective—whose story is being told—and how cinema should handle real tragedies.

    Are there well-known actors among the project’s key participants (without tying them to specific roles)?

    Yes—key participants include Леонардо ДиКаприо, Роберт Де Ниро, Лили Гладстоун, and Джесси Племонс.

    Premise

    Members of the Osage tribe in northeastern Oklahoma are murdered under mysterious circumstances in the 1920s, sparking a major FBI investigation directed by a 29-year-old J. Edgar Hoover and former Texas Ranger Tom White, described by Grann as "an old-style lawman."

    Related Titles There are no related titles yet, but you can add them:

    Martin Scorsese — Best movies and TV Shows

    Add a short review

    280 characters

    Or write an article...

    Sign up and you will see here
    friends impressions of the movie.

    Friends comments and ratings

    Watched

    In two passes, but still. I didn’t get any strong emotions, but I kind of want to put it on a shelf alongside other classics. Exactly what you always expect from Scorsese. And how good Leonel Messi is. Not the most banal role for him, but he did it superbly.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    Technically verified, excellent actors, a beautiful epilogue, but a brutally drawn out film. 1.5-2 hours worth of content, but no, infinity is not the limit for Scorsese. Great movie, but sometimes unbearably boring. It’s like the last half hour of The Irishman, only the whole movie is like this. 7.5 out of 10

    Translated to English

    Watching now

    It would be right to start watching the film, exchanging my plot of land for beads and wrapping myself in a blanket with smallpox, but somehow I’ll try to do without it.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    How hard it is not to spoil for everyone you meet whether the main character will kill his wife at the end of the film or not, you would know…

    Translated to English

    Watched

    Once again, Scorsese filmed a 4-hour movie for streaming. The main problem is the pacing and lack of edge in the script. Where is the deep condemnation of American parasitism on the indigenous people of America? It’s just local history, everything is according to old drawings, nothing new. Really well shot.

    Translated to English

    The three-and-a-half-hour running time is fully justified in an escalating tragedy that never loosens its grip

    Hollywood Reporter

    Watched

    Unlike the equally long "The Irishman,” the movie is completely empty. Events follow one after another, but there seems to be no meaning, other than the obvious conflict between the whites and the Indians. Acting work according to Tinkov: "doubtful, but ok." The soundtrack is also almost more boring than in the last "Batman".

    Translated to English

    Watched

    Despite its awesome cast, DiCaprio’s stunning emotionless performance (except for one moment), painstaking reproduction of time and place, Gladstone’s season opener, this movie is hard to watch in its banality. 6.4 you can throw rotten tomatoes at me.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    I watched Zone of Interest, there is also ordinary violence, but not as great as here.

    Translated to English

    There’s probably an Oscar for Best Actress here. (I wonder if Native Americans ever received an award in this category?)

    Translated to English

    Watched

    The film is heavy in everything – both the chronicle, and the master actors, and the story itself. I don’t know why this page of history is so close to Scorsese, but you can feel it in everything. It’s not for nothing that he personally appeared in the finale. Leopold, the editor and the composer take away my personal Oscars.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    The film is not bad, but the running time is completely unjustified. Minus one point for that.

    Translated to English

    The best performance of Leonardo DiCaprio’s entire career

    IndieWire

    Watched

    I didn’t start watching the film for a long time because I was reading the book so I could compare it later. Well, the film follows the plot of the book and, despite the length, is more addictive. But more than 3 hours are not always beneficial. The film is interesting, but the director has more interesting films.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    Disconcerting with its unhurried pace and downright Kaurismäkiev-esque simplicity, it’s like the anti-Godfather. Instead of romanticization there is monstrosity, instead of New York there is a bush, instead of an anti-hero there is a creature. S. for the first time rejected cinephilism – this is first and foremost an ethical gesture, and only then cinema.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    My 900th viewing was this grandiose work by Scorsese about human greed, hypocrisy, selfishness and cruelty. The movie is really powerful with very convincing acting, the timing was not killer. It’s a pity that this is a true story

    Translated to English

    Watched

    While not a painful viewing experience, much of the film is downright boring. Since everything is laid bare from the very first minutes, and all the characters in this story are portrayed as naive idiots, one is left to make do with Leo’s apt portrayal and the pleasant editing.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    A powerful film investigation that reveals tragic events in US history. Martin Scorsese is great again, creating an entertaining movie with a gripping storyline and great acting.

    Translated to English

    Monumental stuff. Both vast and intimate in scope. Exceptional filmmaking, by an exceptional filmmaker.

    Empire

    Watched

    A story about stupidity, greed and how weak character and lack of will can lead to great tragedy. A beautiful shell, wonderful actors, but simple emptiness inside. Just a good story that doesn’t offer anything interesting or new… and yes, 3.5 hours could have been reduced

    Translated to English

    Watched

    It’s a pleasure to see your favorite actors in the roles of finished antiheroes. The film tells the moral depths to which lying, hypocritical sociopaths are ready to sink in order to achieve their goals.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    It’s so… It’s drawn out. Yes, Leo and the others will act out, but the plot is not a mystery. A film for once, maybe not in the cinema. Something like Openheimer.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    The film is about cruelty and violence, about the fact that for the sake of money people make cold calculations. About how you can ruin people’s destinies without having your own opinion, obeying and succumbing to manipulation.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    A true classic movie in all its essence. The film is literally from another era, from another time, even though it is being released now. A true portal to the years when quality cinema prevailed. Lily deserves an award for her acting, and Leo has a character similar to "Gilbert Grape"

    Translated to English

    Watched

    An interesting story, well filmed and well acted. Yes, long, but even, without sagging or tightness

    Translated to English