Killers of the Flower Moon

Scorsese played with genres skillfully and told this sordid story well. I expected more from the acting, but DiCaprio’s role as a blockhead, constantly trying to understand what’s going on, was a success. Chronom logged in without any problems – T. Schoonmaker reminds us that she is one of the great editors

Despite its awesome cast, DiCaprio’s stunning emotionless performance (except for one moment), painstaking reproduction of time and place, Gladstone’s season opener, this movie is hard to watch in its banality. 6.4 you can throw rotten tomatoes at me.

How hard it is not to spoil for everyone you meet whether the main character will kill his wife at the end of the film or not, you would know…

Disconcerting with its unhurried pace and downright Kaurismäkiev-esque simplicity, it’s like the anti-Godfather. Instead of romanticization there is monstrosity, instead of New York there is a bush, instead of an anti-hero there is a creature. S. for the first time rejected cinephilism – this is first and foremost an ethical gesture, and only then cinema.

In two passes, but still. I didn’t get any strong emotions, but I kind of want to put it on a shelf alongside other classics. Exactly what you always expect from Scorsese. And how good Leonel Messi is. Not the most banal role for him, but he did it superbly.

A powerful film investigation that reveals tragic events in US history. Martin Scorsese is great again, creating an entertaining movie with a gripping storyline and great acting.

The film is not bad, but the running time is completely unjustified. Minus one point for that.

I didn’t start watching the film for a long time because I was reading the book so I could compare it later. Well, the film follows the plot of the book and, despite the length, is more addictive. But more than 3 hours are not always beneficial. The film is interesting, but the director has more interesting films.

There’s probably an Oscar for Best Actress here. (I wonder if Native Americans ever received an award in this category?)

The film is heavy in everything – both the chronicle, and the master actors, and the story itself. I don’t know why this page of history is so close to Scorsese, but you can feel it in everything. It’s not for nothing that he personally appeared in the finale. Leopold, the editor and the composer take away my personal Oscars.

Unlike the equally long "The Irishman,” the movie is completely empty. Events follow one after another, but there seems to be no meaning, other than the obvious conflict between the whites and the Indians. Acting work according to Tinkov: "doubtful, but ok." The soundtrack is also almost more boring than in the last "Batman".

My 900th viewing was this grandiose work by Scorsese about human greed, hypocrisy, selfishness and cruelty. The movie is really powerful with very convincing acting, the timing was not killer. It’s a pity that this is a true story

While not a painful viewing experience, much of the film is downright boring. Since everything is laid bare from the very first minutes, and all the characters in this story are portrayed as naive idiots, one is left to make do with Leo’s apt portrayal and the pleasant editing.

Technically verified, excellent actors, a beautiful epilogue, but a brutally drawn out film. 1.5-2 hours worth of content, but no, infinity is not the limit for Scorsese. Great movie, but sometimes unbearably boring. It’s like the last half hour of The Irishman, only the whole movie is like this. 7.5 out of 10

I watched Zone of Interest, there is also ordinary violence, but not as great as here.

Great job by Scorsese in adapting the book with great production and a powerful cast. But you should read the book, because in the film the emphasis was shifted from the investigation itself and Tom White towards DiCaprio’s hero, Ernest.

It would be right to start watching the film, exchanging my plot of land for beads and wrapping myself in a blanket with smallpox, but somehow I’ll try to do without it.

Once again, Scorsese filmed a 4-hour movie for streaming. The main problem is the pacing and lack of edge in the script. Where is the deep condemnation of American parasitism on the indigenous people of America? It’s just local history, everything is according to old drawings, nothing new. Really well shot.

The picture is very important for the United States, as it raises very unpleasant topics in American history. DiCaprio finally got out of the image of a cunning egoist and played a typical six, and this, as well as the tandem with De Niro, only benefited him. Definitely worth a look

Epochal, masterful, very long. At the same time, I can’t say that there is even one extra scene in the film. It’s just that the historicity of the events seemed to oblige Scorsese to draw some conclusions, and therefore the last hour with the trial looks somewhat faded against the background of the splendor of the rest of the picture.

Martin made a movie based on the plot from the viral video "Well, you’re an Indian, I’ll kill you. BAM-BAM" and a meme where DiCaprio tenses his jaw, although the tension has already gone away.