Movie's ratings

    526 430

    News

    Soundtrack

    Killers of the Flower Moon (Soundtrack from the Apple Original Film)

    Different stars

    • 1 Robbie Robertson(Intro) The Sacred Pipe 0:39
    • 2 Robbie RobertsonOsage Oil Boom 2:51
    • 3 Robbie RobertsonMy Land...My Land 2:11
    • 4 Robbie RobertsonHeartbeat Theme / Ni-U-Kon-Ska 3:34
    • 5 Robbie RobertsonThey Don't Live Long 2:55
    • 6 Robbie RobertsonThe Wedding 2:05
    • 7 Robbie RobertsonTribal Council 1:13
    • 8 Robbie RobertsonReign of Terror 2:51
    • 9 Robbie RobertsonInsulin Train 2:50
    • 10 Robbie RobertsonTulsa Massacre Newsreel 2:24
    • 11 Robbie RobertsonShame On Us 2:42
    • 12 Robbie RobertsonToo Much Dynamite 2:56
    • 13 Robbie RobertsonNot If It's Illegal 2:47
    • 14 Robbie RobertsonSalvation Adagio 3:11
    • 15 Robbie RobertsonStill Standing 3:48
    • 16 Rayna Gellert, Kieran Kane, Philip Jamison & David MansfieldTupelo Blues 2:54
    • 17 Vince Giordano & NighthawksLivery Stable Blues 1:55
    • 18 Adam NielsenThe Gallop, Chasse, Pas de Bourree 0:37
    • 19 Vince Giordano & NighthawksMetropolis (A Blue Fantasie) 2:11
    • 20 Andy SteinMollie 0:21
    • 21 Osage Tribal SingersWahzhazhe (A Song for My People) 6:26

    72

    Country
    Spoken Language
    Runtime 3 hr 26 min
    Budget $200 000 000
    Premiere: World $158 772 599 October 8, 2023
    USA $68 035 488
    Other countries $90 737 111
    Box Office – Budget – $41 227 401
    Premiere: USA $68 035 488 September 27, 2023
    first day $9 401 256
    first weekend $23 253 655
    theaters 3786
    Digital: World December 5, 2023
    Parental Advisory
    • Frightening & Intense Scenes

      plenty

    • Violence & Gore

      plenty

    • Profanity

      average

    • Alcohol, Drugs & Smoking

      few

    • Sex & Nudity

      few

    Production Companies

    About the film Killers of the Flower Moon

    When oil is discovered in 1920s Oklahoma under Osage Nation land, the Osage people are murdered one by one — until the FBI steps in to unravel the mystery.

    Смотреть онлайн

    Сast and Crew

    Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI

    About the Book

    Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI is a non-fiction book written by David Grann. Published in 2017, the book delves into the chilling true story of the Osage Indian murders in the 1920s. This series of crimes, which took place in Osage County, Oklahoma, involved the systematic killing of wealthy Osage Nation members who had become rich from oil deposits found beneath their land.

    Author

    David Grann is an acclaimed journalist and author known for his investigative work and narrative non-fiction. His meticulous research and compelling storytelling have earned him a reputation as a leading figure in the genre.

    Book's Themes and Impact

      • Historical Context: The book provides a detailed account of the Osage murders and the subsequent investigation, which was one of the first major cases handled by the newly formed FBI.

      • Social Commentary: It explores themes of greed, racism, and the exploitation of Native Americans, shedding light on a dark chapter in American history.

      • Investigative Journalism: Grann's work is praised for its thorough research and ability to weave a gripping narrative from historical events.

    Adaptation and Fidelity to the Book

    The film adaptation of Killers of the Flower Moon aims to stay true to the book's narrative and themes. Directed by Martin Scorsese, the film seeks to capture the essence of Grann's work, focusing on the historical and emotional depth of the story. While adaptations often require changes for cinematic purposes, the film strives to maintain the integrity of the book's portrayal of the events and characters involved.

    The True Story Behind "Killers of the Flower Moon"

    Historical Background

    The film "Killers of the Flower Moon" is based on the true events surrounding the Osage Indian murders in the 1920s. This dark chapter in American history is often referred to as the "Osage Reign of Terror." During this period, members of the Osage Nation in Oklahoma became some of the wealthiest people in the world due to the discovery of oil beneath their land.

    The Osage Murders

    In the early 20th century, the Osage people were granted headrights to the oil-rich land, which meant they received significant royalties from oil companies. However, this wealth attracted unscrupulous individuals who sought to exploit and murder the Osage to gain control of their headrights.

      • Between 1921 and 1925, more than two dozen Osage were murdered or died under suspicious circumstances.

      • The murders were often carried out through poisoning, shootings, and other violent means.

      • The conspiracy involved local businessmen, law enforcement, and even some members of the Osage community.

    The FBI Investigation

    The Osage murders eventually caught the attention of the newly formed Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Under the leadership of J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI launched an investigation led by agent Tom White. The investigation uncovered a vast conspiracy orchestrated by a local cattleman named William Hale, who sought to gain control of the Osage wealth through murder and manipulation.

    Adaptation and Accuracy

    The film is based on the book "Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI" by David Grann. The book meticulously details the events and the investigation, providing a comprehensive account of the Osage murders.

    The film adaptation strives to remain faithful to the historical events and the book's narrative. It captures the complexity of the conspiracy and the impact on the Osage community. While some artistic liberties may be taken for dramatic effect, the core story remains true to the real-life events that unfolded during this tragic period in American history.

    FAQ

    What is “Killers of the Flower Moon” about?

    It’s a crime drama about a string of murders targeting the Osage people in 1920s Oklahoma after an oil boom—and how greed, racism, and corruption seep into family ties and local power.

    Is the film based on true events?

    Yes. It draws from real crimes against the Osage and the investigations that became a key milestone in the development of U.S. federal law enforcement. It is based on the nonfiction book by Дэвида Гранна.

    What themes does the film explore beyond the crime story?

    It tackles colonial violence, systemic racism, resource exploitation, the corruption of justice by power, and the destructive compromises that can exist inside marriage and family.

    Why does the story focus on family dynamics rather than only the investigation?

    Because the crimes aren’t presented as distant true-crime headlines; they’re shown as evil embedded in everyday life—where trust, love, marriage, and kinship can be weaponized for control and profit.

    Who directed it, and why is it notable in that director’s work?

    It’s directed by Мартин Скорсезе. It stands out in his filmography by turning his recurring focus on power, money, and crime toward an Indigenous community and a tragedy that unfolds under a veneer of legality and social acceptance.

    Why is the film so long, and is the runtime justified?

    The runtime allows the film to depict the crimes as a system—how trust and manipulation are built, pressure escalates, and violence becomes ‘normalized’ over time. If you expect a fast-paced thriller, it may feel slow.

    How close is the film to the book, and why might it differ?

    The core facts and context remain, but the film shifts emphasis: it’s not only about ‘who investigated,’ but about how the crimes operated inside a community and a family. Adaptations inevitably condense timelines and merge events for dramatic structure.

    Who wrote the screenplay?

    The screenplay was developed by multiple writers; one of the key screenwriters is Эрик Рот.

    Is there violence in the film, and how intense is it?

    Yes. The violence can be brutal and emotionally heavy, generally not for spectacle but to underline the cost of impunity and the fear people live under. Sensitive viewers should note themes of murder, threats, and trauma.

    Why does the film spend so much time on the Osage community and daily life?

    It prevents the Osage from being reduced to ‘true-crime victims’ and instead presents them as a living community with traditions, family, joy, and grief—making the scale of loss clearer when violence targets an entire people.

    Is the film more about the investigation or about moral choices?

    More about moral decay and complicity: the investigation matters, but the film’s strongest angle is how people rationalize evil when money, power, and ‘profitable’ loyalty are at stake.

    Why has the film sparked so much discussion and debate?

    Because it confronts a painful historical trauma, depicts violence as systemic, and asks uncomfortable questions about who benefits. It also prompts debate about perspective—whose story is being told—and how cinema should handle real tragedies.

    Are there well-known actors among the project’s key participants (without tying them to specific roles)?

    Yes—key participants include Леонардо ДиКаприо, Роберт Де Ниро, Лили Гладстоун, and Джесси Племонс.

    Themes

    The analysis of the themes in the book and film has centered on the difference between Killers of the Flower Moon and traditional Westerns in the old Hollywood tradition. Jorge Cotte of The Nation stated: "Unlike the visions of unbounded freedom found in traditional westerns, Martin Scorsese's new film is a study of a West bounded by the vertical geometry of oil rigs and the violent conspiracies of powerful men."

    • Osage Oil Boom
    • Heartbeat Theme / Ni-U-Kon-Ska
    • Wahzhazhe (A Song for My People)
    • Killers of the Flower Moon (Soundtrack from the Apple Original Film)

    Related Titles There are no related titles yet, but you can add them:

    Martin Scorsese — Best movies and TV Shows

    Critique: 62

    90%
    56 0

    Killers of the Flower Moon is a full-on cinematic experience. It’s rare that a movie that you should see is also one you want to see. This is...

    I give Killers of the Flower Moon a mild recommendation. It’s too long and predictable. The saving grace is its performance across the board.

    Scorsese has delivered an ordeal pretty much guaranteed to leave a bad taste in your mouth, one that in this case plays as pedestrian and repe...

    Stylistically, this feels like a young man’s movie. It’s engrossing from the get-go, the palpable tension methodically echoed by Robbie Robert...

    This is epic filmmaking and a reminder that the kinds of antisocial, amoral characters who have long represented Scorsese’s bread-and-butter d...

    The Killers of the Flower Moon, a visceral epic, is the story of the wreckage of a people, the evil in white men’s hearts and the poison they...

    Weaving the Tulsa race riots, the KKK and the Masons into its tapestry, Scorsese’s opus questions the misdeeds of America in the last century while...

    The three-and-a-half-hour running time is fully justified in an escalating tragedy that never loosens its grip — a sordid illustration of hist...

    Killers of the Flower Moon is a cathedral of a movie, cavernously huge in ambition and scale, yet oddly intimate in its effect on the viewer.

    It is, it has to be said, something of a stretch to believe that this regal woman would be drawn to a dullard such as Ernest, but Gladstone an...

    Bolstered by a strong cast and a luscious color palette and landscape, Killers of the Flower Moon is worthy of a watch for those who can look...

    Killers of the Flower Moon is monumentally long (206 minutes) and moves at an unhurried pace, but it knows where it’s going and barely a...

    Lifting his camera to survey the wide open plains of the past, Scorsese extracts an epic Western from horrible real-life crimes committed against t...

    Although its moral ambition is to honor the tribulations of an Indigenous people, it keeps getting pulled back into the orbit—emotional, social, an...

    This is a master artist putting a stamp on not only his own career, but also the entirety of American cinema and, why not, American history, too.

    An honorable try, the movie nevertheless doesn’t fully capture the enormity of the tragedy. At best it’s a sorrowful, necessary dirge. Other t...

    Those who do stick with Killers of the Flower Moon – and you all should – when it opens later in the year will, however, be rewarded with the most...

    The Associated Press October 18, 2023

    [Scorsese] has called his work an offering to the Osage, and to other Native peoples. It also feels like an offering to those who love cinema, allo...

    The result of all this careful questioning is stunning. To say Scorsese has made a great movie is to announce that water is wet, but there’s&n...

    If «Killers» miscalibrates its balance of perspectives, it also discovers, in the luminous recesses of Gladstone’s performance, a quality of contem...

    Good old reliable Marty pulls it off again, addictively unraveling a tale that’s almost too terrible to be true with panache, gusto and just t...

    Killers of the Flower Moon is a three-hander on an epic canvas, a corrosive analysis of America’s colonialist and capitalist excesses as refra...

    Out of a dark chapter of history about U.S. mistreatment of Native Americans, director Martin Scorsese crafts a new movie classic with st...

    For all its extravagant running time (three hours and 26 minutes!), its big-swing history lessons, and its tale of an Old West giving way...

    In his 80th year, Martin Scorsese remains a master of craft and storytelling, and while Killers of the Flower Moon may not rise to the greates...

    Roth and Scorsese carefully seed Killers of the Flower Moon’s script with context, texture, and detail, even when they’re avoiding exposition and m...

    It’s a heartbreaking story and all the more brutal for its surface-level simplicity.

    DiCaprio and De Niro are brilliant, but it is relative unknown Lily Gladstone who is truly extraordinary.

    Killers of the Flower Moon is flawed, but still worth seeing. The film’s final scene, which will surely be divisive, is perhaps the best coda Scors...

    On paper, this looks like a flatly impossible task for DiCaprio: the film’s central character is neither hero nor charismatic outlaw, but ...

    This is an utterly absorbing film, a story that Scorsese sees as a secret history of American power, a hidden violence epidemic polluting the...

    In the end, I recommend seeing it, but I think Killers of the Flower Moon is the kind of movie you respect and admire without much actual enjo...

    It’s one of Scorsese’s most brutal films, yet one of his most thoughtful and self-reflexive, as he crafts a subversive murder «mystery» that l...

    Killers of the Flower Moon is vast and vital in its scale, purpose and emotional scope, a Western-thriller and ensemble piece that is every bit&nbs...

    There’s a difference between «long» and «epic,” although in movie terms the two frequently get confused. Martin Scorsese delivers the former b...

    The villains are fairly obvious in «Flower Moon,” but Scorsese asks audiences to take a wider look at systemic racism, historical injustice an...

    Martin Scorsese’s true-crime American period piece Killers of the Flower Moon is a big, sweeping, glorious, heartbreaking, insightful, powerfu...

    Killers of the Flower Moon earns its expansive presence. Not only is Scorsese trying to condense an epic of American history and true crime, its ex...

    Serrated with political edge, Scorsese’s true-crime epic is impeccably constructed and utterly gripping.

    After the facile mysticism of Silence, the tone-deaf anti-union cant of The Irishman and the self-indulgent cutesiness of Rolling Thunder Revue: A...

    Monumental stuff: a story about the deadly legacy of America’s colonial sins, both vast and intimate in scope. Exceptional filmmaking, by an except...

    A tremendous but chilling achievement from one of America’s great storytellers.

    Scorsese is a master at his peak who has made deliberate choices about the story he wants to tell, and the way he wants to tell it, and he mak...

    Killers Of The Flower Moon is as momentous as the country it’s set in and as full of history as the people whose murder it depicts.

    Most strikingly, for a murder thriller, Killers of the Flower Moon is fatally lacking in dread or suspense.

    Even amid its flaws – Scorsese’s sprawling focus leaving some characters in the dust, most of them the very indigenous Americans this film pur...

    Martin Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon is a bladder-buster of a movie with no obvious bathroom break, no section where the story starts...

    This is on first impression perhaps a very good, uneven film rather than an unequivocally great one.

    In the end, Killers of the Flower Moon is like a puzzle—each creative piece does its part to form the complete picture.

    For all of the episodic ramble of Killers of the Flower Moon, not enough space is provided to restoring palpable personhood to people so relentless...

    Killers of the Flower Moon is a fast, fierce, and unapologetic gut punch that centers the horrific abuse suffered by the Osage nation at the h...

    The story’s romance is warmly inviting, and DiCaprio and Gladstone work beautifully together, their different performance styles – Ernest is p...

    Martin Scorsese triumphs yet again.

    Scorsese has rendered a tragic, forlorn piece of American history, indebted equally to classical Hollywood craftsmanship and the director’s ow...

    Above all, it’s a Martin Scorsese picture, brimming with reverence for a culture that survived a horrible trauma as it is filled with exh...

    There’s no doubt that Killers of the Flower Moon reflects a shift in energy that is defensible – even necessary – from an ethical po...

    «Killers» is a master class in filmmaking, taught by that one professor we all had in college whose every word we hung on, and whose classes a...

    Ms. Gladstone draws a lot of sympathy as the modest, helpless Mollie, but like everything else here her performance suffers from inertia. She...

    Scorsese and cinematographer Rodrigo Prieto manage cinematic flourishes that tell us everything we need to know in a particular moment.

    It’s a difficult balancing act for a filmmaker as gifted and operatic as Scorsese, whose ability to tell any story rubs up against his ultimat...

    It’s a pity that on this occasion Scorsese makes an admirable and fine film, but alas not a great one.

    There’s a way of looking at this movie, a colossal tale of the sociopathy of American history, that’s a matter of listening to what’s said and...

    Add critique link

    Add a short review

    280 characters

    Or write an article...

    What users like and dislike

    • Acting: Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert De Niro, and Lily Gladstone received high praise for their outstanding performances.
    • Direction: Martin Scorsese was praised for his masterful work and ability to create an atmosphere.
    • Historical accuracy: The film is based on real events, which adds depth and significance to it.
    • Visuals: The sets, costumes, and cinematography received high praise for their authenticity and quality.
    • Themes: The film addresses important and complex themes such as greed, morality, and historical injustice.
    • Runtime: Many viewers found the film too long and drawn out, which reduces its pace and engagement.
    • Plot: Some users noted that the plot lacks unexpected twists and may be predictable.
    • Narrative pace: The film is criticized for being slow-paced and lacking sharpness in the screenplay.
    • Emotional impact: Some viewers felt that the characters and their stories do not evoke strong emotions or empathy.

    Sign up and you will see here
    friends impressions of the movie.

    Friends comments and ratings

    Watched

    In two passes, but still. I didn’t get any strong emotions, but I kind of want to put it on a shelf alongside other classics. Exactly what you always expect from Scorsese. And how good Leonel Messi is. Not the most banal role for him, but he did it superbly.

    Translated to English

    There’s probably an Oscar for Best Actress here. (I wonder if Native Americans ever received an award in this category?)

    Translated to English

    The best performance of Leonardo DiCaprio’s entire career

    IndieWire

    Watched

    My 900th viewing was this grandiose work by Scorsese about human greed, hypocrisy, selfishness and cruelty. The movie is really powerful with very convincing acting, the timing was not killer. It’s a pity that this is a true story

    Translated to English

    Watched

    Unlike the equally long «The Irishman,” the movie is completely empty. Events follow one after another, but there seems to be no meaning, other than the obvious conflict between the whites and the Indians. Acting work according to Tinkov: «doubtful, but ok.» The soundtrack is also almost more boring than in the last «Batman».

    Translated to English

    Watched

    While not a painful viewing experience, much of the film is downright boring. Since everything is laid bare from the very first minutes, and all the characters in this story are portrayed as naive idiots, one is left to make do with Leo’s apt portrayal and the pleasant editing.

    Translated to English

    Monumental stuff. Both vast and intimate in scope. Exceptional filmmaking, by an exceptional filmmaker.

    Empire

    Watched

    Despite its awesome cast, DiCaprio’s stunning emotionless performance (except for one moment), painstaking reproduction of time and place, Gladstone’s season opener, this movie is hard to watch in its banality. 6.4 you can throw rotten tomatoes at me.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    I didn’t start watching the film for a long time because I was reading the book so I could compare it later. Well, the film follows the plot of the book and, despite the length, is more addictive. But more than 3 hours are not always beneficial. The film is interesting, but the director has more interesting films.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    How hard it is not to spoil for everyone you meet whether the main character will kill his wife at the end of the film or not, you would know…

    Translated to English

    Watched

    I watched Zone of Interest, there is also ordinary violence, but not as great as here.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    A powerful film investigation that reveals tragic events in US history. Martin Scorsese is great again, creating an entertaining movie with a gripping storyline and great acting.

    Translated to English

    The three-and-a-half-hour running time is fully justified in an escalating tragedy that never loosens its grip

    Hollywood Reporter

    Watched

    The film is heavy in everything – both the chronicle, and the master actors, and the story itself. I don’t know why this page of history is so close to Scorsese, but you can feel it in everything. It’s not for nothing that he personally appeared in the finale. Leopold, the editor and the composer take away my personal Oscars.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    Technically verified, excellent actors, a beautiful epilogue, but a brutally drawn out film. 1.5-2 hours worth of content, but no, infinity is not the limit for Scorsese. Great movie, but sometimes unbearably boring. It’s like the last half hour of The Irishman, only the whole movie is like this. 7.5 out of 10

    Translated to English

    Watching now

    It would be right to start watching the film, exchanging my plot of land for beads and wrapping myself in a blanket with smallpox, but somehow I’ll try to do without it.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    Once again, Scorsese filmed a 4-hour movie for streaming. The main problem is the pacing and lack of edge in the script. Where is the deep condemnation of American parasitism on the indigenous people of America? It’s just local history, everything is according to old drawings, nothing new. Really well shot.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    Disconcerting with its unhurried pace and downright Kaurismäkiev-esque simplicity, it’s like the anti-Godfather. Instead of romanticization there is monstrosity, instead of New York there is a bush, instead of an anti-hero there is a creature. S. for the first time rejected cinephilism – this is first and foremost an ethical gesture, and only then cinema.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    In my opinion one of the best films of 2023. Leo and De Niro are beyond praise. Gladstone feels sorry for the entire film. For 3 hours 28 minutes you are immersed in the cruel, but such an atmospheric world created by Scorsese. Until the last moment you hope for the best and humanity. Great job! Bravo! Be human!

    Translated to English

    Watched

    The hands of the white American bastards, hungry for oil money, are squeezing the sages’ throats more and more tightly, and you, as a viewer, feel it almost physically. An absolutely great movie, Scorsese has once again made a film that is tempting to be called the best of his career.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    «Killers of the Flower Moon» is an incredibly interesting movie for almost 3.5 hours! This is a personal record for me in terms of duration, as well as for the director and the entire cast.

    By the way, the actors were chosen very well – they all played excellently.

    The scenery, the presentation of the story, the quality of the filming – everything is at a high level.

    The main advantage of the film is that, despite the modern shooting and excellent image quality, it is made in a classic style. It even reminds me of «Once Upon a Time in… Hollywood».

    Of course, such a length affected the box office receipts, but there were other reasons.

    Overall, I have absolutely no regrets about watching this film and devoting 3.5 hours to it – it was worth it.

    Rating: 7.8/10

    Translated to English

    Watched

    Scorsese played with genres skillfully and told this sordid story well. I expected more from the acting, but DiCaprio’s role as a blockhead, constantly trying to understand what’s going on, was a success. Chronom logged in without any problems – T. Schoonmaker reminds us that she is one of the great editors

    Translated to English

    You cannot give a rating lower than the director deserves, especially if he is an artist and truly great. About cinema: the heroine, of course, is much more important than the hero here. DiCaprio is great, this is, of course, a nomination.

    Translated to English

    Watched

    Great job by Scorsese in adapting the book with great production and a powerful cast. But you should read the book, because in the film the emphasis was shifted from the investigation itself and Tom White towards DiCaprio’s hero, Ernest.

    Translated to English

    Scorsese brought together his favorites De Niro and DiCaprio into one film, a must-see!

    Translated to English