The film's plot is based on an earlier script entitled WW3.com by David Marconi, screenwriter of the 1998 film Enemy of the State. Using John Carlin's Wired magazine article entitled "A Farewell to Arms", Marconi crafted a screenplay about a cyber-terrorist attack on the United States. The attack procedure is known as a "fire sale", depicting a three-stage coordinated attack on a country's transportation, telecommunications, financial, and utilities infrastructure systems. After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the project was stalled, only to be resurrected several years later and rewritten into Live Free or Die Hard by Doug Richardson and eventually by Mark Bomback.
Movie's ratings
Live Free or Die Hard
(2007)4
| Country | |
| Spoken Language | english, italian, french |
| Runtime | 2 hr 9 min |
| Budget | $110 000 000 |
| Premiere: World | $388 156 011 June 12, 2007 |
| USA | $134 529 403 |
| Other countries | $253 626 608 |
| Box Office – Budget | $278 156 011 |
| Premiere: USA | $134 529 403 June 22, 2007 |
| first day | $9 111 638 |
| first weekend | $33 369 559 |
| Digital: World | July 1, 2009 |
| Parental Advisory | Frightening & Intense Scenes, Profanity, Violence & Gore, ... |
| |
| Production Companies | |
| Also Known As | Die Hard 4 United States Die Hard 4.0 United Kingdom |
Description
John McClane is forced to team up with a young computer hacker, Matt Farrell, to stop a master cyber-terrorist called Thomas Gabriel, who wants to shut down the entire nations computer infrastructure in a mass cyber attack.Сast and Crew
Director
Camera
Author
Composer
Director
Camera
Author
Composer
Editor
Videos Stills Posters Filming Promo Screenshots Covers
Book Behind the Film "Live Free or Die Hard"
About the Book
The film "Live Free or Die Hard" is loosely based on the article "A Farewell to Arms" by John Carlin. The article was published in the May 1997 issue of Wired magazine. It explores the vulnerabilities of the United States' digital infrastructure and the potential for cyber-terrorism.Author
John Carlin is a journalist and author known for his work on technology and its impact on society. His article provided a speculative look at how a cyber-attack could disrupt national security and daily life.Film Adaptation
While the film "Live Free or Die Hard" takes inspiration from Carlin's article, it significantly expands on the concept to create a high-stakes action narrative. The movie incorporates elements of cyber-terrorism but adds a fictional storyline and characters to enhance the action and drama. The adaptation focuses more on the action sequences and the character of John McClane, played by Bruce Willis, rather than strictly adhering to the article's content.Production
Sequels/Prequels
Related Titles There are no related titles yet, but you can add them:
Len Wiseman — Best movies and TV Shows
Critique: 30
Wisely, Live Free doesn’t try to replicate the paranoia or intimidation of the first film… This time, it’s his unflappable calm that in...
The action in this fast-paced, hysterically overproduced and surprisingly entertaining film is as realistic as a Road Runner cartoon.
Live Free or Die Hard’s goofy generation-gap gambit pays off decently and proves, again, that nattily dressed terrorists are no match for Wil...
It’s not remotely plausible, but with Willis' McClane leaping onto the tailfins of passing jet fighters and bringing down helicopters by laun...
You know where you are with Bruce Willis. Unlike Schwarzenegger, he won’t be moving into namby-pamby politics any time soon. He differs from...
One of the surprises of the fourth instalment, apart from how good it is (who expected that?) is that the threat is internal.
Live Free or Die Hard may work better for an audience that doesn’t know much about the series than it will for Die Hard die hards, who will b...
It has enough mind-blowing stunts to leave audience members walking out and inventing obscenity-laced catchphrases of their own.
This time the hype is real. The latest Die Hard film, the first in a dozen years, is the best in the series, an invigorating return to the sty...
The bad guys' omnipotence at nearly every turn dilutes the film’s suspense.
That this implausible stew works as well as it does is in part a tribute to the unlikely but enjoyable rapport that forms between old school M...
The aesthetic point might be elusive, but that’s Bruce. Like this film, he has little time for detail.
It’s the movie equivalent of a cop on the eve of retirement: he knows what he has to do, and he gets it done. But his heart isn’t...
Terrific entertainment, and startlingly shrewd in the bargain, a combination of minimalist performances – interestingly minimalist – and...
At least I hope it’s the last. Willis does OK for a middle-aged guy, but as another famous die-hard once said, a man’s got to know...
Yippee-ki-yay! Willis still has the goods. Credit to Wiseman, who keeps the thrills coming, and pass the popcorn.
What’s the fourth "Die Hard" called? I keep forgetting. "Die Hard: With a Pension"? "Die Hardened Arteries"? "Die Laughing"?
An enjoyable pop projection of post-9/11 anxiety. That said, it also makes you nostalgic for the days when irresponsible action movies didn&rs...
Though it’s mostly entertaining (if overlong), there is a sense that the whole thing has become somewhat rote.
Live Free or Die Hard is the most creative and exciting Die Hard film since the original, though it’s hardly the original’s equal.
Live Free or Die Hard is indeed a worthy successor to the original – not perhaps quite as good, but close.
Willis has a firm grip on what has made his character popular for nearly two decades, and maintains a firm hand on the wheel. Like almost...
Willis was entitled to one more kick-ass action outing. But please, let this be the last. Anything more would be dying soft.
More unpleasant than the notion that Matt’s nationalism and manhood can only be validated with a gun, though, is the misogyny that creep...
But ultimately it’s [Bruce] Willis who makes this loopy action movie so endearing…Nobody dies it better.
The post-9/11 techno-terrorist stuff works, the fights are creative and funny, and Willis is in top form in his career-defining role.
Sorry, boys. After two decades, the first film still does more with one skyscraper than Live Free or Die Hard does with an entire country.
Movie characters like McClane are the Paul Bunyans and John Henrys and Pecos Bills of our age, the stuff of tall tales spun with the technology of...
Add critique link
Quotes
On your tombstone it should read, 'Always in the wrong place at the wrong time.'
Sign up and you will see here
friends impressions of the movie.
Friends comments and ratings
Watched
I still like this movie. Time after time I want to remember how in their time they knew how to stage action without being overloaded with computer graphics, how well the actors played. A healthy dose of nostalgia is definitely guaranteed. I advise connoisseurs of the genre and good cinema to read it.
Watched
After rewatching the entire tetralogy (the fifth part-sorry, it’s too much), I rewatched the rating. It’s a great action movie, but a 9 was a bit too high on my part.
Watched
John McClane is still going strong and woe to those terrorists who, by the will of fate, cross his path. Of course, there is not enough logic, the main villain came out gray and lacking charisma, but it turned out to be quite fun, and the duel between a truck and a fighter jet is definitely worth watching.
Add a short review
280 characters