Movie's ratings
News
- James Wan & Leigh Whannell Tease New 'Saw' Installment: "You Can't Make A 'Saw' Movie Without Jigsaw" Bloody Disgusting January 31, 2026
- Blumhouse Buys Rights to ‘Saw’ Franchise Variety June 18, 2025
- ‘Saw X’ Trailer: Jigsaw Wants to Play His Most Personal Game Yet Variety July 30, 2023
- Tobin Bell Returns as Jigsaw in ‘Saw’ Sequel Variety October 24, 2022
- 'Saw' - Tobin Bell Will Return in Next Year's Brand New Installment! Bloody Disgusting October 24, 2022
All news
Saw
(2004)14
| Country | |
| Runtime | 1 hr 43 min |
| Budget | $1 200 000 |
| Premiere: World | $104 045 735 October 1, 2004 |
| USA | $56 000 369 |
| Other countries | $48 045 366 |
| Box Office – Budget | $102 845 735 |
| Premiere: USA | $56 000 369 October 29, 2004 |
| first day | $311 812 |
| theaters | 2063 |
| rollout | 62 days |
| Digital: World | October 1, 2007 |
| Parental Advisory | Frightening & Intense Scenes, Profanity, Violence & Gore, ... |
| |
| Production Companies | |
| Also Known As | Jigsaw United States |
Description
Two men awaken to find themselves on the opposite sides of a dead body, each with specific instructions to kill the other, escape or face the consequences. These two are the latest contestants in Jigsaw’s games.
Сast and Crew
Director
Camera
Composer
Videos Stills Posters Filming Promo Screenshots Covers
What is Saw (2004) about, spoiler-free?
Two strangers wake up trapped in a locked room and realize they’re part of a cruel “game.” In parallel, police investigate a string of crimes to identify the mastermind. It blends a contained thriller, detective story, and horror with a focus on moral choice.
How scary and graphic is the film?
It’s tense and at times fairly graphic, with injury/blood and strong psychological pressure. However, much of the horror comes from suspense, atmosphere, and the mystery—not just gore.
Is it a slasher or more of a detective thriller?
It’s closer to a detective thriller and psychological horror with survival elements. Unlike a classic slasher, the focus is on the mystery, the “rules,” and the investigation.
Why is Saw considered a cult classic?
For its then-unusual structure, strong suspense, memorable “game” concept, and a famously surprising ending. It also helped popularize the mid‑2000s wave of dark, puzzle-like horror thrillers.
What themes does the film explore?
The cost of choice, accountability, guilt, the value of life, and the limits of justice. The story is designed to provoke debate about whether ends can ever justify the means.
Do you need the sequels to understand the first movie?
No. The first film stands on its own with a complete arc. Sequels expand the lore and connect character threads, but you don’t need them to follow the core story.
Who might not enjoy this film?
Viewers sensitive to blood/violence, torture themes, or intense psychological stress. It may also feel too bleak if you prefer lighter horror.
What’s the best viewing order for the franchise after the first film?
Release order is best: it preserves the intended reveals and character development. The first film sets the rules, and later entries layer in backstory and connections.
Who is behind the making of the film?
Saw was directed by James Wan and written by Leigh Whannell. Their approach leans on minimal locations, a detective hook, and escalating tension up to the finale.
Why does the film feel so contained and claustrophobic?
Much of the story is intentionally set in tight spaces to amplify the feeling of being trapped. It’s both an artistic choice and a way to keep the focus on the mystery and the characters.
Does the film include a police investigation storyline?
Yes. Alongside the main plot, detectives investigate the crimes to understand the pattern and identify the mastermind. It adds clues and misdirection, boosting the mystery.
Is it a good pick if you like twist endings?
Yes—avoid spoilers if you can. Saw is known for planting details throughout and then snapping them into place in the ending.
What’s the movie’s vibe—more bleak or more action-driven?
More bleak and suspenseful than action-driven. The pacing tightens during problem-solving and dialogue, then spikes during key turns.
Is there a moral point, or is it just shock value?
At its core is a moral dilemma: characters face choices with severe consequences. Shocking moments exist, but they’re tied to the test/punishment concept and the detective structure.
What elements make Saw instantly recognizable without spoilers?
Rule-based “game” mechanics, grim industrial aesthetics, tense puzzles, a strong time-pressure feel, and a finale that reframes what you’ve seen. That combination became widely imitated.
Sign up and you will see here
friends impressions of the movie.
Friends comments and ratings
A well-written detective story with elements of a thriller that never gets old. The ending is very unexpected.
The film has problems, the acting is a bit weird in places, and the script’s nonsense is pretty obvious. But the memorable, biting production and instantly catchy story still make it incredibly re-watchable, even outside the context of all the other sequels.
The film plays with you. At the beginning, the film is catchy and holds suspense, but in the second act everything sags, but the last third act, with its ending, saves the whole situation.
Good plot, message, charismatic antagonist. The only thing that was bad was the plot in the only room, where the dialogue of the 2nd years consisted largely of grunting and swearing at each other. But the tension didn’t leave me, I was wondering how it would all end
Call me sick, but this movie is mesmerizing. So many details scattered like confetti at the beginning of the film melt into one smooth and strict formation by the end. Fascinating.
A modestly budgeted film that became a hit and grew into a cultural phenomenon and long-running franchise, creating one of the iconic villains of modern cinema. When I first watched it, the film kept me in suspense the entire time, and "Hello Zepp" was simply firmly ingrained in my memory.
Great movie! Interesting, gripping, and creepy, and the storyline with the police officer makes it even more interesting. 9/10
very good, I watched it in one sitting, I really liked the mixture of detective and horror. At the beginning you ask the film a lot of questions, but in the end you get answers to all of them. TOP! a must watch.
This really was the standard of a real survival game, with revealing characters and awesome plot twists. The subsequent parts are almost not encouraging. Here at least the action takes place locally in a scary room and there is time to focus on the characters. Everything is very good!
Good horror movie) I thought the ending would be obvious but it’s happily not) excited to watch the next parts)
Brilliant! For a long time I didn’t want to watch this series of films, thinking that it was just a mess and an absurd plot. But I was very wrong, I really liked the first two films, but then they really screwed it up so much that it was funny at times, but interesting nonetheless.
I really loved this film, it made an indelible impression from the first part, the plot was so original that in the future it received great resonance in the form of a "cube" and a "platform". I looked forward to each next part with pleasure.
James Wang. A subtle psychological thriller, exciting, frightening, keeping you in constant suspense… It makes you watch the characters of the film, how they will act in a given situation, what they are ready to do to save their lives and the lives of the people they love.
Add a short review
280 characters