The film is based on the 2006 novel of the same name by Stephen King. Dimension Films announced in March 2006 that Eli Roth would direct the project after finishing Hostel: Part II. Roth exited the project in 2009, saying:
Cell
(2016)| Country | |
| Runtime | 1 hr 38 min |
| Premiere: World | $1 323 012 May 19, 2016 |
| Premiere: USA | July 8, 2016 |
| Digital: World | September 27, 2016 |
| Parental Advisory | Frightening & Intense Scenes, Violence & Gore, Profanity, ... |
| |
| Production Companies | |
| Also Known As | Conexión mortal United States |
Description
When a mysterious cell phone signal causes apocalyptic chaos, an artist is determined to reunite with his young son in New England.Сast and Crew
Director
Camera
Composer
Director
Camera
Composer
Editor
Videos Stills Posters Filming Screenshots
Cell: The Novel
About the Book
Cell is a horror novel written by Stephen King, published in 2006. The story explores the chaos and horror that ensue when a mysterious signal, transmitted through cell phones, turns people into mindless, violent creatures.Author
Stephen King is a renowned American author known for his prolific work in the horror, supernatural fiction, suspense, and fantasy genres. With numerous bestsellers and adaptations, he is often referred to as the "King of Horror."Book vs. Film
The 2016 film adaptation of Cell attempts to capture the essence of Stephen King's novel, but there are notable differences between the two. While the film follows the basic premise of the book, it diverges in terms of character development, plot details, and the overall tone. Fans of the novel may find that the film lacks the depth and complexity that King is known for in his writing.Key Differences
- The film simplifies the plot and character arcs, which may not fully convey the novel's intricate narrative.
- Certain themes and subplots present in the book are either altered or omitted in the film adaptation.
- The ending of the film differs from the novel, offering a more conclusive resolution compared to the book's ambiguous conclusion.
Production
Related Titles There are no related titles yet, but you can add them:
Critique: 14
The concept of humankind turning into one enormous mobile hotspot for use by an evil mastermind has legs. It’s too bad Cell cuts the idea off...
This is the undead equivalent of fast food. Some might find comfort in all these known quantities. Those looking for anything of substance would do...
What makes this movie about a zombie attack different from any other movie about a zombie attack? Nothing but its ineptitude.
Even if it weren’t cheap-looking and dreary, "Cell" would still be hobbled by an entertainment landscape already lousy with zombies, and ...
It’s not a good sign when a movie leaves you wishing that Eli Roth had directed it instead.
Takes an intriguing satirical premise and dilutes whatever potency it had on the page.
If you want a good thriller based on a Stephen King story with the same lead actors, watch 1408 instead. Don’t waste your time...
Even King’s commentary on how cyber-connectivity breeds brainlessness feels shoehorned-in – mostly limited to a few lines from a sn...
Cusack and Jackson aren’t on their finest acting form, and this is one to forget.
The survivors never seem like anything but thinly drawn types and the sporadic attack scenes aren’t especially original or scary.
Not a polished work of filmmaking. Some of the nighttime scenes are so poorly lit it’s difficult to tell what’s happening. The editing...
The slapdash quality to the plotting is matched by the inept film-making – the dialogue is frequently inaudible, the night scenes murkily lit.
Add critique link
Add a short review
280 characters