Puzo started writing a script for a sequel in December 1971, before The Godfather was even released; its initial title was The Death of Michael Corleone. Coppola's idea for the sequel would be to "juxtapose the ascension of the family under Vito Corleone with the decline of the family under his son Michael... I had always wanted to write a screenplay that told the story of a father and a son at the same age. They were both in their thirties and I would integrate the two stories... In order not to merely make Godfather I over again, I gave Godfather II this double structure by extending the story in both the past and in the present." Coppola originally wanted Martin Scorsese to direct the film but Paramount refused. Coppola also, in his director's commentary on The Godfather Part II, mentioned that the scenes depicting the Senate committee interrogation of Michael Corleone and Frank Pentangeli are based on the Joseph Valachi federal hearings and that Pentangeli is a Valachi-like figure.
Movie's ratings
Collections
Show More
Soundtrack
The Godfather, Pt. II (Motion Picture Soundtrack)
Different stars
- 1 Carmine CoppolaMain Title / The Immigrant 3:26
- 2 Carmine CoppolaA New Carpet 1:59
- 3 Carmine CoppolaKay 2:59
- 4 Carmine CoppolaEv'ry Time I Look In Your Eyes / After the Party 2:34
- 5 Carmine CoppolaVito and Abbandando 2:37
- 6 Livio Giorgi & Carmine CoppolaSenza Mama / Ciuri-ciuri / Napule ve salute 2:34
- 7 Carmine CoppolaThe Godfathers At Home 2:34
- 8 Carmine CoppolaRemember Vito Andolini 2:51
- 9 Carmine CoppolaMichael Comes Home 2:18
- 10 Carmine CoppolaMarcia Stilo Italiano 2:01
- 11 Nino PalermoNinna Nanna a Michele 2:21
- 12 Carmine CoppolaThe Brothers Mourn 3:21
- 13 Marcia Religioso & Festa MarchMurder of Don Fanucci 2:49
- 14 Carmine CoppolaEnd Title 3:52
The Godfather: Part II
(1974)11
Country | |
Runtime | 3 hr 22 min |
Budget | $13 000 000 |
Premiere: World | $47 962 897 December 18, 1974 |
USA | $47 834 595 |
Other countries | $128 302 |
Box Office – Budget | $34 962 897 |
Premiere: USA | $47 834 595 December 12, 1974 |
first day | $171 417 |
theaters | 681 |
rollout | 361 days |
Digital: World | March 21, 2022 |
Parental Advisory | Violence & Gore, Frightening & Intense Scenes, Profanity, ... |
| |
Production Companies | |
Description
The early life and career of Vito Corleone in 1920s New York City is portrayed, while his son, Michael, expands and tightens his grip on the family crime syndicate.Сast and Crew
Director
Camera
Composer
Director
Camera
Composer
Videos Stills Posters Filming Promo Screenshots Covers
Production
Sequels/Prequels
Related Titles There are no related titles yet, but you can add them:
Francis Ford Coppola — Best movies and TV Shows
Critique: 33
It goes much deeper than The Godfather in analyzing the twisted mentalities of these men who pervert the capitalist system for their own gain. The...
The new sequel to The Godfather, titled The Godfather, Part II, permits us a second look inside that room, inside that world. At times the vis...
In sheer physical terms, however, Godfather Part II displays even more spectacular panache than its predecessor.
What is so good about the film is the sympathetic way that Coppola has treated such unsympathetic characters, machismo-minded males still worshipin...
Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather, Part II is an even richer, more spellbinding work than its wholly successful predecessor.
One of the most ambitious and brilliantly executed American films, a landmark work from one of Hollywood’s top cinema eras.
An admirable, responsible production, less emotionally disturbing than its predecessor, but a grand historical epic studying the nature of pow...
The magisterial pace of the sequel begins to flag about halfway through… But the performances establish continuities of their own, and the acting t...
Few movie sequels are as good as the films they follow and even fewer have about them the air of necessity. Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfat...
Godfather II is quieter, less propulsive, less furiously violent than Godfather I and it demonstrably lacks the hypnotic patriarchal figure of...
Few sequels have expanded upon the original with the faithfulness and detail of this one.
Either taken alone or together with the original, The Godfather Part II is an astounding work.
The Godfather – Part II is a very good motion picture. It is sporadically violent on the outside, constantly violent on the inside. It be...
Director Francis Ford Coppola furnished a fully-fashioned gangster melodrama in the first film: in this one he stretches his talent to encompa...
All the performances are fine, especially Lee Strasberg as a despicable Meyer Lansky hood; Diane Keaton, as Michael’s despairing wife; R...
It is even better than the first film, and has the greatest single final scene in Hollywood history, a real coup de cinma.
A masterful sequel, replete with action, showmanship, humor and technical craftsmanship.
The Godfather, Part II really has no reason for its lavish existence other than the greediness of its makers. And that is the kind of avarice that...
It delves deeper into the Corleone mythology, past the romanticism, to deliver an epic and intelligent tragedy.
The Godfather now becomes the Gone With The Wind of gangster films and more, in terms of sheer length; but in quality it remains no more than ...
Somehow this beautifully made, intermittently exciting film never pulls us once and for all into its own world. But its ambition, vision and artist...
The film is a very considerable achievement it is an epic about the underbelly of America that says far more than The Great Gatsby, for instan...
The Godfather Part II is quite fascinating in its study of a migrant community and especially of power within that community. A mixture of hor...
Director Francis Ford Coppola has fashioned a film of awesome power and overpowering performances.
The stunning text of The Godfather is replaced in Part II with prologues, epilogues, footnotes, and good intentions.
Add critique link
Sign up and you will see here
friends impressions of the movie.
Friends comments and ratings
Watched
Quite a bit worse than the first part. But Vito’s story is shown very well, and how Mikey turned from a shy guy into a cold-blooded man is shown quite coolly. Although the last scene makes you wonder if he became like this, or was he still there?! Translated to English
Watched
11/104 is one of the most tragic films ever made. Vito’s optimism and love for family contrasts sharply with Michael, who turns his family into a business. The Academy should have been disbanded forever after they didn’t give Al Pacino the Best Actor award for this film. Translated to English
Watched
It impressed me even more than the first film. And especially Al Pacino. He’s just incredible here. I don’t understand how it was possible not to give him an Oscar for such a performance. Translated to English
Watched
It’s a pity that you can’t give a rating higher than 10, because the first part already has a ten. One of those sequels that is just as good, and even better, than its predecessor. Translated to English
Watched
If the first film was about what needs to be sacrificed in order to retain power, then the second is about what this power turns a person into. Translated to English
Watched
A worthy continuation of the history of the new generation of the clan and the early history of its founding, the harmony and beauty of crime is always beautiful. Translated to English
Watched
The sequel, although heavily watered down, turned out to be a good crime film. The scene of young Vito’s assassination attempt on a local mafioso was especially beautifully shot. Completely different problems are being raised, the burden and price of power, the discrediting of the concept of family in the criminal world. Translated to English
Watched
Without Brando, as for me, it’s not quite the same coat. Al Pacino, of course, is great, but he doesn’t live up to Brando. I was a bit bored, especially with such poor timing. 7.5/10 Translated to English
Watched
The sequel is no worse than the first film. While Brando’s performance is lacking, his performance here is complemented by Al Pacino and De Niro. Particular praise is due to De Niro, who took on the role of the young Vito Corleone. His performance is truly Oscar worthy. Translated to English
Watched
It feels like the movie went on forever. To be honest, I don’t like Al Pacino in the role of Godfather, something doesn’t suit him at all. De Niro would have played better (he did, but he chose the wrong timeline). I can’t even note anything interesting from what I saw, hmm! Translated to English